Source: 3)a)6m,Dec2023, 3)a)6m,June2021, RTP,June2019, 3)a)6m,MTP1,Dec20186 Marks
Back to Law List

Question Scenario

Discuss the rule regarding a partner’s implied authority to bind the firm for his acts. Also, explain the situations when the partner has no implied authority to bind the firm. OR Define Implied Authority. In the absence of any usage or custom of trade to the contrary, the implied authority of a partner does not empower him to do certain acts. State the acts which are beyond the implied authority of a partner under the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932?

Estimated Writing Time: 10 mins Try in Practice Mode

Suggested Answer

As per the provisions of Sections 19(1) read with the provisions of Section 22 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which deal with the implied authority of a partner, provide that the act of a partner which is done to carry on, in the usual way, business of the kind carried on by the firm, binds the firm, provided that the act is done in the firm name, or any manner expressing or implying an intention to bind the firm. Such an authority of a partner to bind the firm is called his implied authority. As per the provisions of Section 20 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the partners in a firm may, by contract between the partners, extend or restrict the implied authority of any partner. Notwithstanding any such restriction, any act done by a partner on behalf of the firm which falls within his implied authority binds the firm, unless the person with whom he is dealing knows of the restriction or does not know or believe that partner to be a partner. As per the provisions of Section 21 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, a partner has authority, in an emergency, to do all such acts for the purpose of protecting the firm from loss as would be done by a person of ordinary prudence, in his own case, acting under similar circumstances, and such acts bind the firm. As per the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 19 the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, in the absence of any usage or custom of trade to the contrary, the implied authority of a partner does not empower him to- (a) Submit a dispute relating to the business of the firm to arbitration; (b) open a banking account on behalf of the firm in his own name; (c) compromise or relinquish any claim or portion of a claim by the firm; (d) withdraw a suit or proceedings filed on behalf of the firm; (e) admit any liability in a suit or proceedings against the firm; (f) acquire immovable property on behalf of the firm; (g) transfer immovable property belonging to the firm; and (h) enter into partnership on behalf of the firm. Mode Of Doing Act To Bind Firm (Section 22): In order to bind a firm, an act or instrument done or executed by a partner or other person on behalf of the firm shall be done or executed in the firm name, or in any other manner expressing or implying an intention to bind the firm.

Exam Strategy Tip

When answering law questions in the CA Foundation exam, follow the "Provision -> Facts -> Conclusion" structure for maximum marks. Ensure to state the relevant sections where applicable to earn bonus marks from the evaluator.

Ready to Practice More Law Cases?

Test your knowledge under timed conditions in our dedicated Writing Practice Mode. Get a feel for the real exam pressure.

Enter Writing Practice