Source: RTP,June2024, 1(b)4m,Dec 2021, 1(b)4m,June20184 Marks
Back to Law List

Question Scenario

AK Private Limited has borrowed ` 36 crore from BK Finance Limited. However, as per memorandum of AK Private Limited, the maximum borrowing power of the company is ` 30 crore. Examine whether AK Private Limited is liable to pay this debt? State the remedy, if any available to BK Finance Limited. OR Ravi Private Limited has borrowed ` 5 crores from Mudra Finance Ltd. This debt is ultra vires to the company. Examine, whether the company is liable to pay this debt? State the remedy if any available to Mudra Finance Ltd.?

Estimated Writing Time: 7 mins Try in Practice Mode

Suggested Answer

Doctrine of Ultra Vires (Meaning) – Refer Ans - 15 i) Whether AK Private Limited is liable to pay the debt? As per the facts given, AK Private Limited borrowed ` 36 crore from BK Finance Limited which is beyond its borrowing power of ` 30 crore. Hence, contract for borrowing of ` 36 crore, being ultra vires the Memorandum of Association and thereby is void. AK Private Limited is not, therefore, liable to pay the debt. ii) Remedy available to BK Finance Limited: In light of the legal position explained above, BK Finance Limited cannot enforce the said transaction and thus has no remedy against the company for recovery of the money lent. BK Finance limited may take action against the directors of AK Private Limited as it is the personal liability of its directors to restore the borrowed funds. Besides, BK Finance Limited may take recourse to the remedy by means of ‘Injunction’, if feasible. OR As per the facts given, Ravi Private Limited borrowed ` 5 crore from Mudra Finance Ltd. This debt is ultra vires to the company, which signifies that Ravi Private Limited has borrowed the amount beyond the expressed limit prescribed in its memorandum. This act of the company can be said to be null and void. In consequence, any act done or a contract made by the company which travels beyond the powers not only of the directors but also of the company is wholly void and inoperative in law and is therefore not binding on the company. So is being the act void in nature, there being no existence of the contract between the Ravi Private Ltd. and Mudra Finance Ltd. Therefore, the company Ravi Private Ltd. is liable to pay this debt amount upto the limit prescribed in the memorandum. Remedy available to the Mudra Finance Ltd.: The impact of the doctrine of ultra vires is that a company can neither be sued on an ultra vires transaction, nor can it sue on it. Since the memorandum is a “public document”, it is open to public inspection. Therefore, a company which deals with the other, is deemed to know about the powers of the company. So, Mudra Finance Ltd. can claim for the amount within the expressed limit prescribed in its memorandum.

Exam Strategy Tip

When answering law questions in the CA Foundation exam, follow the "Provision -> Facts -> Conclusion" structure for maximum marks. Ensure to state the relevant sections where applicable to earn bonus marks from the evaluator.

Ready to Practice More Law Cases?

Test your knowledge under timed conditions in our dedicated Writing Practice Mode. Get a feel for the real exam pressure.

Enter Writing Practice