Source: 5)a)7m,MDTP9, 5)a)7m,June20247 Marks
Back to Law List

Question Scenario

PTC Hotels in Bombay decided to sell their furniture by auction sale. For this purpose, they appointed RN & Associates as auctioneer. They invited top ten renowned Architects in Bombay for bidding. A right to bid was not notified by them. Furniture was put up in lots for sale. It was decided that for every lot of furniture there will be a reserve price. On 25th Feb 2024, Auction sale was started at 10.am in the lawn of PTC Hotels Bombay. For a special lot of furniture three parties came for bidding Mr. Neel, Mr. Raj and Mr. Dev on behalf of their respective companies. Bidding was as follows:\nMr. Neel ` 5.70 lakh\nMr. Raj ` 4.85 lakh\nMr. Dev ` 6.10 lakh\nThe sale was completed in favour of Mr. Neel by RN & Associates by fall of hammer. Mr. Dev's Bid was rejected on ground that Right to bid was reserved and company of Mr. Dev was not invited to bid.\nFor another bid of Italian Furniture was made by two parties as follows:\nMr. Dheer ` 15 lakh\nMr. Madhu (on behalf of R N & Associates) ` 15.20 lakh\nSale was completed in favour of Mr. Dheer instead of Mr. Madhu.\nMr. Dev and Mr. Madhu argued that auction sale was not lawful. Give your opinion with reference to provisions of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 whether Auction Sale will be considered lawful or not?

Estimated Writing Time: 12 mins Try in Practice Mode

Suggested Answer

An ‘Auction Sale’ is a mode of selling property by inviting bids publicly and the property is sold to the highest bidder. Section 64 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 regulates the legal requirements for the sale by auction. \nIn terms of the provisions of the above Section, following are some of the requirements, which inter alia are required to be complied with for conduct of a valid auction sale-\n(i) Where the goods are sold in lots: Where the goods are put up for sale in lots, each lot is prima facie deemed to be subject of a separate contract of sale. \n(ii) Right to bid may be reserved: Right to bid may be reserved expressly by or on behalf of the seller and where such a right is expressly reserved, but not otherwise, the seller or any one person on his behalf may bid at the auction. \n(iii) Where the sale is not notified by the seller: Where the sale is not notified to be subject to a right to bid on behalf of the seller, it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid himself or to employ any person to bid at such sale, or for the auctioneer knowingly to take any bid from the seller or any such person; and any sale contravening this rule may be treated as fraudulent by the buyer. \n(iv) Reserved price: The sale may be notified to be subject to a reserve or upset price; \nIn the first Auction sale, the rejection of Mr. Dev’s bidding was not justified since the information as to the right to bid was not expressly given. Therefore, this auction sale was unlawful. \nIn auction sale of lot 2, since right to bid was not notified, it shall not be lawful for the seller to bid himself or to employ any person to bid at such sale. Therefore, auction made in favour of Mr. Dheer will be considered lawful.

Exam Strategy Tip

When answering law questions in the CA Foundation exam, follow the "Provision -> Facts -> Conclusion" structure for maximum marks. Ensure to state the relevant sections where applicable to earn bonus marks from the evaluator.

Ready to Practice More Law Cases?

Test your knowledge under timed conditions in our dedicated Writing Practice Mode. Get a feel for the real exam pressure.

Enter Writing Practice