Corporate and Other LawsSubjectiveQuestion 5374 of 221
All Questions For any discrepancies in this question, email contact@cadada.in
Ad
Ad
Detailed Solution & Explanation
(a) (i) Whether it is compelling upon the Board to consider the directions
regarding shift of the venue of the meeting?
In the case of section 8 company, in pursuance of the second proviso
to section 96(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the time, date and place
of each Annual General Meeting is required to be decided upon
before-hand by the board of directors having regard to the
directions, if any, given in this regard by the company in its general
meeting. [Notification G.S.R. 466(E) issued by the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs on the 5th June, 2015].
Hence, the directors are bound to consider the directions regarding
shifting of venue for the next Annual General Meeting.
Alternate Answer to Part (i)
As per the facts of the question, the members, in one of the general
meetings, have strongly suggested that the next AGM of the
company be held near the vicinity of the Registered Office at Jaipur
instead of the club as the same has congested sitting area.
Since only suggestions have been given in one of the general
meetings, the same cannot be construed as a compulsion on the part
of the Board to act thereon. A mere suggestion will not tantamount
to be a binding direction. In other words, a suggestion is just an idea
or an opinion that someone proposes which need be compulsorily
acted upon, while a direction is a set of instructions for where to go
or what to do.
So, the suggestion by the shareholders is non-binding on the Board.
(ii) Whether a 15 days’ prior notice is valid as per law?
Notification G.S.R. 466(E) issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
dated 5th June, 2015 provides that section 8 company can hold a
meeting with minimum of 14 days' notice as against 21 days' notice
otherwise applicable under section 101 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Hence, the director can validly issue a 15 days' notice being greater
than 14 days as provided in the notification and the notice is as per
the law.
(iii) Whether the decision to provide the facility of only physical voting
and not e-voting valid?
Yes, as per the provision of section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013
read
with
Rule
20
of
the
Companies
(Management
and
Administration) Rules, 2014, section 8 company, having a number of
members of 1000 or more, is required to provide e- voting facility to
its members at a general meeting. Hence, the decision of the
foundation, to provide the facility of only physical voting and not
E-voting, is not valid as section 8 Company is having 1200 members.
OR
(i) Whether the members Mr. H, Mr. K and Mr. J can validly issue special
notice to the company?
According to section 115 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act),
where, by any provision contained in this Act or in the Articles of a
company, special notice is required for passing any resolution, then
the notice of the intention to move such resolution shall be given to
the company by such number of members holding not less than 1%
of the total voting power, or holding shares on which such aggregate
CORPORATE AND OTHER LAWS
sum not exceeding five lakh rupees, as may be prescribed, has been
paid-up.
**Rule 23** of the Companies (Management & Administration) Rules,
2014, provides that a special notice required to be given to the
company shall be signed, either individually or collectively by such
number of members holding not less than one percent of total voting
power or holding shares on which an aggregate sum of not less than
5,00,000 rupees has been paid up on the date of the notice.
As per section 140 (4) of the Act, a special resolution is required to be
passed for appointment of an auditor other than the retiring auditor
at an annual general meeting.
Mr. H, Mr. J and Mr. K are together holding shares of (1,50,000 +
1,00,000 + 2,50,000) = which is equal to the minimum
required shares to be held by members for validly issuing a Special
Notice. Hence, they can validly ask the company to issue the special
notice.
(ii) Last date for issue of Special Notice:
**Rule 3** of Companies Management and Administrative Amendment
Rules 2014:
The notice referred to in sub-rule (1) shall be sent by members to the
company not earlier than three months but at least fourteen days
before the date of the meeting at which the resolution is to be
moved, exclusive of the day on which the notice is given and the day
of the meeting.
Hence, in the above case, the special notice shall be sent by the
members to the company latest by 13.09.2024.
(iii) Whether the company needs to communicate the special notice to
the other members after receipt of the same?
Yes, the company shall immediately after receipt of the notice, give its
members notice of the resolution at least seven days before the
meeting, exclusive of the day of dispatch of notice and day of the
meeting, in the same manner as it gives notice of any general meetings.
Alternate Answer
In the question, it is mentioned that Srinivas Iron and Steel Limited is a
Public Sector, Listed Company, which means that, being a Public Sector
Company, it is a Government Company.
According to section 139(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, in the case of a
Government company or any other company owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by the Central Government, or by any State Government or
Governments, or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or
more State Governments, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall,
in respect of a financial year, appoint an auditor duly qualified to be
appointed as an auditor of companies under this Act, within a period of one
hundred and eighty days from the commencement of the financial year, who
shall hold office till the conclusion of the annual general meeting.
Changing the Auditor: For changing the Auditor of a Government
Company, the Auditor can be changed after seeking consent of the Board
and thereafter by writing to the C&AG, New Delhi, by mentioning the
reference of negligence on the part of the Statutory Auditors for not
reporting the fraud committed in the Company.
Thereafter, considering the request of the company, the C&AG can
change the auditor or the audit firm. However, the remuneration of the
auditors shall be approved by the shareholders in its general meeting on
the recommendations of the Audit Committee as well the Board of
Directors of the company.
(b) **Section 124** of the Companies Act, 2013 contains the provisions relating
to Unpaid Dividend Account (UDA).
Unpaid or Unclaimed Dividend to be transferred to the Unpaid Dividend
Account.
Where a dividend has been declared by a company but has not been paid or
claimed within 30 days from the date of declaration, the company shall,
within 7 days from the expiry of the said period of 30m days, transfer the
total amount of unpaid or unclaimed dividend to a special account called the
‘Unpaid Dividend Account’ which shall be opened in any scheduled bank.
If any money transferred to this Unpaid Dividend Account remains unpaid
or unclaimed for a period of seven years from the date of transfer of such
CORPORATE AND OTHER LAWS
account, it shall be transferred by the company along with interest
accrued thereon to the Investor Education and Protection Fund
established under section 125(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 maintained
and administered by the Central Government.
As per section 124(6) of the Act, all shares in respect of which the
dividend has not been paid or claimed for 7 consecutive years or
more shall be transferred by the company in the name of Investor
Education and Protection Fund along with a statement containing the
prescribed details.
As per the facts of the question, Manish, a shareholder of the company
has not claimed his dividends from the company for the last 10 years.
Eventually, after expiry of the 7th consecutive year, the shares of Manish
along with the dividends due to him for the last 10 years would have been
already transferred by the company to the Investor Education and
Protection Fund along with a statement containing the prescribed details.
Therefore, Manish should claim his shares along with the dividends due
from IEPF in accordance with the prescribed procedure and on submission
of prescribed documents.
(c) Meaning of the term ‘‘Current Account Transaction”
As per the provision of section 2(j) of the Foreign Exchange Management
Act, 1999, “Current Account Transaction” means a transaction other than a
Capital Account Transaction and includes the following types of
transactions:
(i) Payments in the course of ordinary course of foreign trade, other
services such as short-term banking and credit facilities in the
ordinary course of business etc.,
(ii) Payments in the form of interest on loans or income from
investments,
(iii) Remittances for living expenses of parents, spouse and children
residing abroad, and
(iv) Expenses in connection with foreign travel, education and medical
care of parents, spouse and children.
Key Concepts to Understand
More Questions from Corporate and Other Laws
If and then is:
, find
Find value of if
The cost of oranges and apples is . If the cost of an apple is doubled then the cost of oranges and apples is . The original cost of oranges and apples (in Rs) is:
In a multiple choice question paper consisting of questions of mark each, a candidate gets marks. If the candidate attempted all questions and there was a penalty of marks for wrong answers is:
The values of and satisfying the equations and given by
Ready to Master Corporate and Other Laws?
Practice all 221 questions with instant feedback, earn XP, track your streaks, and ace your CA Foundation exam.
Start Practicing — It's Free