Auditing and EthicsSubjectiveQuestion 6206 of 213
All Questions

Question 5 (a) Z Ltd. engaged ABC & Co., Chartered Accountants, to conduct its statutory audit for the F.Y. 2023-24. The audit team developed an overall audit strategy and plan to address the risk. During the audit, several significant changes occurred, including the discovery of a material misstatement in inventory valuation and changes in the scope of audit procedures due to an unexpected acquisition by Z Ltd. The audit documentation for Z Ltd. should reflect these changes but the auditor of a company failed to document the audit strategy and the audit plan. As a senior auditor of the firm briefly outline what should be included in the documentation of audit strategy and audit plan and how should the audit documentation address significant changes made during the audit engagement. (5 Marks) (b) SRP Limited appointed M/s JK & Co. as its statutory auditors. Auditors while carrying out the audit observed that company has entered into a complex transaction having material effect on the financial statements. In order to have realistic information on the said transaction (relevant to the audit), audit team decided to take assistance from those charged with governance. Two of the team members were discussing as to who can be 26

For any discrepancies in this question, email contact@cadada.in

Detailed Solution & Explanation

"Those charged with governance" but could not get a fair idea of the same. Can you guide them by explaining the same? (5 Marks) (c) Helping Hands Co-operative society is working for the welfare of its members since last 10 years. Governing body observed that the society had some idle funds during the F.Y. 2023-24 and considering the equity markets growth, decided to invest the same in blue chip mutual funds. Decision brought fortune and society earned handsome return on the investment made. Auditor of the society however gave a qualified opinion. Management has hired you to guide where they went wrong. Give your comments considering section 32 of the Central Act? (4 Marks) Answer (a) The auditor shall document: (i) The overall audit strategy: The documentation of the overall audit strategy is a record of the key decisions considered necessary to properly plan the audit and to communicate significant matters to the engagement team. (ii) The audit plan: The documentation of the audit plan is a record of the planned nature, timing and extent of risk assessment procedures and further audit procedures at the assertion level in response to the assessed risks. It also serves as a record of the proper planning of the audit procedures that can be reviewed and approved prior to their performance. The auditor may use standard audit programs and/or audit completion checklists, tailored as needed to reflect the particular engagement circumstances. (iii) Any significant changes made during the audit engagement to the overall audit strategy or the audit plan, and the reasons for such changes: A record of the significant changes to the overall audit strategy and the audit plan, and resulting changes to the planned nature, timing and extent of audit procedures, explains why the significant changes were made, and the overall strategy and audit plan finally adopted for the audit. It also reflects the appropriate response to the significant changes occurring during the audit. AUDITING AND ETHICS (b) Who are “Those Charged with Governance”: • The person(s) or organization(s) (e.g., a corporate trustee) with responsibility for overseeing the strategic direction of the entity and obligations related to the accountability of the entity. This includes overseeing the financial reporting process. • For some entities, those charged with governance may include management personnel, for example, executive members of a governance board of a private or public sector entity, or an owner-manager. • Governance structures vary by entities, reflecting influences such as different cultural and legal backgrounds, and size and ownership characteristics. For example, in some entities, a supervisory board exists that is separate from executive board. • In other entities, both supervisory and executive functions are performed by a single board. In some entities, those charged with governance hold positions that are an integral part of the entity’s legal structure. For example, company directors. In some cases, some or all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the entity. In others, those charged with governance and management comprise different persons. • In most entities, governance is the collective responsibility of a governing body, such as a board of directors, a supervisory board, partners, proprietors, a committee of management, trustees, or equivalent persons. • In some smaller entities, however, one person may be charged with governance, for example, the owner-manager where there are no other owners, or a sole trustee. • Such diversity means that it is not possible to specify for all audits the persons with whom the auditor is to communicate particular matters. Also, in some cases, the appropriate persons with whom to communicate may not be clearly identifiable from the applicable legal framework or other engagement circumstances, for example, entities where the governance structure is not formally defined, such as some family-owned entities and some not-for-profit organizations. • In such cases, the auditor may need to discuss and agree with the engaging party the relevant persons with whom to communicate. In deciding with whom to communicate, the auditor’s understanding of an 28 SUGGESTED ANSWER entity’s governance structure and processes obtained in accordance with SA 315 is relevant. The appropriate persons with whom to communicate may vary depending on the matter to be communicated. (c) According to section 32 of the Central Act, a society may invest its funds in any one or more of the following: (i) In the Central or State Co-operative Bank. (ii) In any of the securities specified in section 20 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882. (iii) In the shares, securities, bonds or debentures of any other society with limited liability. (iv) In any co-operative bank, other than a Central or State co-operative bank, as approved by the Registrar on specified terms and conditions. (vi) In any other moneys permitted by the Central or State Government. In the given case, Helping Hands Co-operative society invested the funds in blue chip mutual funds due to which auditor gave a qualified opinion. Helping Hands Co-operative society should invest the funds in accordance with Section 32 of Central Act as investment in blue chip mutual funds is not permissible.

More Questions from Auditing and Ethics

Ready to Master Auditing and Ethics?

Practice all 213 questions with instant feedback, earn XP, track your streaks, and ace your CA Foundation exam.

Start Practicing — It's Free